October 1st, 2009

sheriff lenin Ленин

У нас светское государство или нет?



Это я к чему?
Учебник-хрестоматия "Литература. 8 класс" соответствует программе по литературе для 5-11 классов (авторы-составители Г.С.Меркин, С.А.Зинин, В.А.Чалмаев), допущенной Министерством образования РФ. Он знакомит школьников с фольклором, произведениями.
С какими же произведениями знакомят восьмиклассников?

Слово о святом Сергии
О монастыре на Дубенке
О голутвинском монастыре
О посещении Богоматерью святого
О кончине святого
Житие Сергия Радонежского
Житие Александра Невского


Как-то неуютно, что дочь будет по таким учебникам изучать литературу :(
sheriff lenin Ленин

IIFFMCG Report

Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Conflict in Georgia (IIFFMCG) Report


There is the question of whether the use of force by Georgia in South Ossetia, beginning with the shelling of Tskhinvali during the night of 7/8 August 2008, was justifiable under international law.
It was not.
Georgia had acknowledged that the prohibition of the use of force was applicable to its conflict in South Ossetia in specific legally binding international documents, such as the Sochi Agreement of 1992 or the 1996 Memorandum on Measures to Provide Security and Strengthen Mutual Trust between the Sides in the Georgian-South Ossetian Conflict. Even if it were assumed that Georgia was repelling an attack, e.g. in response to South Ossetian attacks against Georgian populated 23 villages in the region, according to international law, its armed response would have to be both necessary and proportional.
It is not possible to accept that the shelling of Tskhinvali during much of the night with GRAD multiple rocket launchers (MRLS) and heavy artillery would satisfy the requirements of having been necessary and proportionate in order to defend those villages. It follows from the illegal character of the Georgian military assault that South Ossetian defensive action in response did conform to international law in terms of legitimate self-defence.

At least as far as the initial phase of the conflict is concerned, an additional legal question is whether the Georgian use of force against Russian peacekeeping forces on Georgian territory, i.e. in South Ossetia, might have been justified.
Again the answer is in the negative.
There was no ongoing armed attack by Russia before the start of the Georgian operation. Georgian claims of a large-scale presence of Russian armed forces in South Ossetia prior to the Georgian offensive on 7/8 August could not be substantiated by the Mission. It could also not be verified that Russia was on the verge of such a major attack, in spite of certain elements and equipment having been made readily available. There is also no evidence to support any claims that Russian peacekeeping units in South Ossetia were in flagrant breach of their obligations under relevant international agreements such as the Sochi Agreement and thus may have forfeited their international legal status.
Consequently, the use of force by Georgia against Russian peacekeeping forces in Tskhinvali in the night of 7/8 August 2008 was contrary to international law.